Space

Super-Earths might be solid deep on the inside

Super-Earths might be solid: Bluish planet with its reddish star nearby and another planet about halfway between them.
View larger. | Artist’s concept of the super-Earth exoplanet LP 890-9 c. It orbits a red dwarf star 98 light-years from Earth. A new study suggests that super-Earths might be solid deep on the inside. This is due to minerals under extreme pressure and temperature – much more extreme than inside Earth – being compressed. Image via NASA/ JPL-Caltech/ Eos.
  • Super-Earths are rocky exoplanets, larger and more massive than Earth but smaller than Neptune. What are they like on the inside?
  • Researchers at Princeton University say in a new study that, surprisingly, super-Earths might be solid deep down in their mantles.
  • The study suggests the minerals inside these worlds would take on unusual forms due to the extreme heat and pressure deep down, meaning they would remain solid instead of melting.

Science news, night sky events and beautiful photos, all in one place. Click here to subscribe to our free daily newsletter.

Super-Earths might be solid inside

Super-Earths are rocky exoplanets that are larger and more massive than Earth, but smaller than Neptune. Powerful telescopes have provided clues about what their atmospheres are like. But what are they like on the inside?

Some astronomers have suggested these worlds could contain oceans of magma. Now, a new study from researchers at Princeton University in New Jersey suggests something surprising; super-Earths might actually be solid deep inside their mantles. That’s because under the intense pressure and heat deep below the surface, some minerals could take unusual forms.

The researchers found these minerals could likely withstand the extremely high temperatures and pressures deep inside super-Earths – much hotter than inside Earth – and remain solid.

Nathaniel Scharping wrote about the new findings for Eos on August 6, 2026.

The researchers published their peer-reviewed paper in AGU Advances on July 18, 2026.

3 different sized planets, Earth and 2 nearly featureless ones, on black background.
View larger. | Illustration depicting the size of a super-Earth called CoRoT-7b. Super-Earths are larger and more massive than Earth, but smaller and less massive than Neptune. Image via Aldaraon/ Wikimedia Commons.

Minerals take unusual forms

Scientists expect that some common minerals found inside Earth should be present within super-Earths as well. This includes substances like magnesium orthosilicate (Mg2SiO4). But the interiors of super-Earths have much more intense pressures and temperatures than inside Earth.

As noted in Eos, the atoms in the mineral would rearrange into different crystal structures. As explained in the article:

One of these high-pressure forms is called the spinel phase [spinel group], which is found in Earth’s mantle. At even higher pressures, this phase breaks down into two different minerals: bridgmanite, the most abundant mineral phase in Earth, and ferropericlase, a magnesium-rich oxide. However, under the far more extreme pressures expected inside massive rocky planets known as super-Earths, Mg2SiO4 becomes stable again in an entirely new crystal structure called post-post-spinel. Scientists predict that this ultrahigh-pressure phase of Mg2SiO4 is one of the dominant minerals in the deep mantles of super-Earths, making its melting behavior important for understanding how these planets form and evolve.

Cutaway view of a planet with several layers around the core. Magnetic lines arcing from pole to pole.
View larger. | This is an artist’s concept of a super-Earth with a deep magma ocean generating a magnetic field. The new study suggests that the deepest parts of these magma oceans in the mantle would remain solid instead of liquid. Image via University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics/ Michael Franchot/ University of Rochester.

Recreating conditions inside super-Earths

It is difficult to recreate these kinds of conditions in a lab. So the researchers did a computer model recreation instead. They used a technique called thermodynamic integration to study the melting curve of this mineral – the bizarrely named post-post-spinel Mg2SiO4 – at up to 1,300 gigapascals of pressure.

The post-post-spinel Mg2SiO4 is a refractory mineral. That means it can withstand extremely high temperatures before it begins to melt. Pressure plays a role, too. Depending on the pressure, it melts between 9,780 K (17,144 degrees Fahrenheit or 9,507 degrees Celsius) and 14,897 K (26,350 degrees Fahrenheit or 14,620 degrees Celsius). That is much hotter than temperatures at which related minerals melt, including bridgmanite and postperovskite (MgSiO3). Postperovskite is the high-pressure form of bridgmanite, which is stable near Earth’s core-mantle boundary.

In most exoplanets, iron would end up mixing with the post-post-spinel Mg2SiO4. The researchers found that even then, the melting point for post-post-spinel Mg2SiO4 remained above the temperatures estimated for the deep mantles of most rocky planets.

Effects on super-Earths inside and out

In short, this means that many super-Earths likely have solid deep mantles. This can affect both convection inside the planet and magnetic fields outside the planet. Interestingly, another study from earlier this year found that super-Earths with powerful magnetic fields might be more likely to be able to support life.

Bottom line: Super-Earths might be solid in their deep insides, a new study says. Minerals might take unusual forms and remain solid despite the intense heat and pressure.

Source: Massive Rocky Planets May Suppress Deep Melting

Via Eos

Read more: Powerful magnetic fields on super-Earths could boost chances of life

Read more: Nearby super-Earth GJ 3378b may be a good candidate for life

Posted 
August 19, 2026
 in 
Space

Like what you read?
Subscribe and receive daily news delivered to your inbox.

Your email address will only be used for EarthSky content. Privacy Policy
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

More from 

Paul Scott Anderson

View All