Georgia State University astronomers announced on December 9, 2013 that they now have observational evidence for the theoretically predicted break between very low-mass stars and brown dwarfs. They say they can point to a precise temperature, radius and luminosity of the lowest mass stars. According to these astronomers, in order to be a star, an object must have temperature of at least 2,100 K, a radius 8.7% that of our sun, and a luminosity or intrinsic brightness 1/8000th that of the sun.
The Georgia State astronomers also identified a particular star as a representative of the smallest stars. Its designation is 2MASS J0513-1403.
The Astronomical Journal has accepted their paper for publication. You’ll find a preprint here.
Dr. Sergio Dieterich, the paper’s lead author, explained in a press release:
In order to distinguish stars from brown dwarfs we measured the light from each object thought to lie close to the stellar/brown dwarf boundary. We also carefully measured the distances to each object.
We could then calculate their temperatures and radii using basic physical laws, and found the location of the smallest objects we observed. We see that radius decreases with decreasing temperature, as expected for stars, until we reach a temperature of about 2,100 K. There we see a gap with no objects, and then the radius starts to increase with decreasing temperature, as we expect for brown dwarfs.
These astronomers are members of the RECON group at Georgia State. RECONS stands for Research Consortium on Nearby Stars. The data for their study came from the SOAR (Southern Astrophysical Research) 4.1-m telescope and the SMARTS (Small and Moderate Aperture Research Telescope System) 0.9-m telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) in Chile.
What makes an object a star? A star is a star because it shines via thermonuclear fusion reactions in its core. Although made from the same stuff as stars, an object without sufficient mass cannot get hot enough inside to ignite fusion reactions. Sometimes we would call that object a planet (like Jupiter), and sometimes, if the object is more than about 10 times Jupiter’s mass, we would call it a brown dwarf.
These astronomers say their work answers “a fundamental question in stellar astrophysics about the coolest and least massive stars.”
But it may also have implications in the search for life in the universe. That is, brown dwarfs are cool, probably too cool to support habitable planets, while very low-mass stars provide constant warmth and a low ultraviolet radiation environment for billions of years, and thus might support life.
Thus knowing how to distinguish low-mass stars from high-mass brown dwarf may be a boon to those searching for habitable worlds, according to these astronomers.
Deborah Byrd created the EarthSky radio series in 1991 and founded EarthSky.org in 1994. Today, she serves as Editor-in-Chief of this website. She has won a galaxy of awards from the broadcasting and science communities, including having an asteroid named 3505 Byrd in her honor. A science communicator and educator since 1976, Byrd believes in science as a force for good in the world and a vital tool for the 21st century. "Being an EarthSky editor is like hosting a big global party for cool nature-lovers," she says.