EarthSky // Interviews // Human World By Jorge Salazar Mar 17, 2009

Jennifer Kuzma urges consumer transparency for nanoproducts

Jennifer Kuzma talks about the impact of nanotechnology – the engineering of materials at the atomic scale – on the food we eat.

DownloadEmbed
close

Copy the following code to embed this player

DownloadEmbed
close

Copy the following code to embed this player

Jennifer Kuzma: Be aware that nanotechnology is out there. It can have great benefits, but that there will be some risks inevitably.

That’s Jennifer Kuzma with the Center for Science, Technology, and Public Policy at the University of Minnesota. Kuzma studies the impact of nanotechnology – the engineering of materials at the atomic scale – on the food we eat. She’s an expert on nanotech regulation in the U.S.

Jennifer Kuzma: The current level of oversight is basically ‘stay the course’ – regulate them under existing laws.

Nowadays, you see the word ‘nano’ used in advertising. But products using that word may not be made with nanotechnology. Meanwhile, actual nanoproducts don’t need to be identified as such. Kuzma said that’s a problem.

Jennifer Kuzma: Nanoparticles, or nanomaterials can penetrate through tissues, biological systems, more readily – they can penetrate cells, the nuclei of some cells.

She thinks better consumer information is needed for products made with nanotechnology.

Jennifer Kuzma: You can’t currently get the information that you need to get in order to evaluate those risks and benefits and make your own informed choices.

Thanks today to the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service National Research Initiative Program and Cornell University.

Read more: An inventory of nanotechnology-based consumer products currently on the market.

Our thanks to:
Jennifer Kuzma
Center for Science, Technology, and Public Policy
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN

Share your comments on Facebook

2 Responses to Jennifer Kuzma urges consumer transparency for nanoproducts

  1. T. Mendoza says:

    This is a fascinating idea that needs to be addressed. As an attorney, I am not surprised that legislation is not up to date with technology. This tends to be the case. I suppose we must trust the scientists to behave in an ethical manner. Keep your fingers crossed!!

  2. Rae Kittrell says:

    Point received and well taken, when I disagree its not a reason to argue. No problem at all.

Share your comments on EarthSky

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>