Science WireSpace

April 2013 gamma-ray burst may call for rewrite of theories

In April 2013, an incredibly bright flash of light burst from the direction of the constellation Leo. Originating billions of light-years away, this explosion of light, called a gamma-ray burst, has now been confirmed as the brightest gamma-ray burst ever observed. Astronomers around the world were able to view the blast in great detail and observe several aspects of the event for the first time ever, according to a press release issued today from Stanford University.

These astronomers said the data could lead to a rewrite of standard theories of how gamma-ray bursts work.

When the core of a massive star collapses, it can eject a jet of gas into space at nearly the speed of light. Collisions between the fast-moving gas and its surroundings, as well as within the jet itself, create gamma rays. Image via NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

The April 2013 blast, named GRB 130472A, was observed by several space- and ground-based telescopes, and the data were analyzed by dozens of astronomers around the world. The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope was the first to detect the event, and it quickly began monitoring the flood of radiation using its Large Area Telescope (LAT), whose principal investigator is Peter Michelson, a physics professor at Stanford and the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. Michelson leads the international collaboration that built and operates the LAT.

Fermi’s quick action, allowing the LAT to record nearly the entire event, yielded data that revealed previously unknown aspects of the mechanisms involved in a gamma-ray burst.

The findings are reported in a series of papers published by the journal Science at the Science Express website on November 21, 2013.

A special cosmic event

Several features of GRB 130472A combined to make it of particular interest to astronomers.

First, according to these astronomers, the blast occurred 3.6 billion light-years away from Earth, which is less than half the distance of the typical GRB. The record-setting 20 hours that the LAT observed gamma rays was longer than any other observed GRB. And, in addition to being the brightest GRB ever witnessed, it was also one of the most energetic. Nicola Omodei, a research associate at Stanford’s Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory who led LAT data analysis for one of the Science papers, said:

When that happens, we start seeing features that we were not able to observe before. Especially because it was very bright, you can uncover features that were not predicted by the standard models.

The leading theory explaining long gamma-ray bursts such as GRB 130427A posits that they are created during the most energetic explosions in the cosmos, which occur when a very massive star collapses on itself.

These explosions erupt a jet of elementary particles traveling at close to the speed of light. Within the jet, pressure, temperature and density are not uniform, creating internal shock waves that move inward and outward as faster regions within the jet collide with slower ones.

As the jet travels outward, it collides with the interstellar medium to create additional shock waves, called external shocks. Although details are not well understood, particles are accelerated at the shock front and, at the same time, interact with the surrounding electromagnetic fields. This causes particles to lose part of their energy emitting photons, through a process known as synchrotron radiation.

The balance between the gain in energy from acceleration by the shock and the loss of energy due to synchrotron radiation dictates the maximum energy of the photons that can be emitted by such a system. The highest energy photons among these are classified as gamma rays and are detected by the LAT.

The observations of GRB 130472A, however, didn’t quite match energy levels predicted by these models.

An unexpected observation

For instance, the telescopes detected more photons, and more high-energy gamma rays, than theoretical models would predict for a burst of this magnitude. In particular, a few of these high-energy events are so energetic that they cannot be produced via existing models of synchrotron radiation from shock-accelerated particles.

Additionally, the prevailing thought was that the brightest flashes were driven by the explosion’s internal shock waves, but the evidence indicates that these photons were created externally. Omodei said:

It’s like having a blanket that’s too short. You pull it up to your chin and uncover your toes. With our standard model, if you try to explain the pulse, you will fail to explain the energy.

The new observations don’t rule out the existing model, but researchers will need to either amend portions of it or adopt a new theory altogether to account for these characteristics, said Giacomo Vianello, a postdoctoral scholar in Michelson’s group and a co-author who performed LAT data analysis and interpretation on three of the Science papers.

The microphysics of how particles are accelerated involves a certain amount of well-thought assumptions, and these assumptions therefore get built into the theoretical models used to predict the behavior of cosmic events. The assumptions are necessary in part because these events cannot be recreated in laboratory settings, he said, which highlights the critical role that observations play in the fine-tuning of fundamental physics theories. He said:

The really cool thing about this GRB is that because the exploding matter was traveling at [nearly] the speed of light, we were able to observe relativistic shocks. We cannot make a relativistic shock in the lab, so we really don’t know what happens in it, and this is one of the main unknown assumptions in the model. These observations challenge the models and can lead us to a better understanding of physics.

Via Stanford University

November 21, 2013
Science Wire

Like what you read?
Subscribe and receive daily news delivered to your inbox.

Your email address will only be used for EarthSky content. Privacy Policy
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

More from 

Editors of EarthSky

View All