Paraplegic man stands, moves legs

A breakthrough, 30 years in the making, is cause for cautious hope among those with spinal cord injuries.

A team of scientists at the University of Louisville, UCLA, and the California Institute of Technology has achieved a significant breakthrough in its initial work with a paralyzed male volunteer at Louisville’s Frazier Rehab Institute – the result of 30 years of research to find potential clinical therapies for paralysis. The study appeared online May 20, 2011 in the British medical journal The Lancet.

The man, Rob Summers, 25, was completely paralyzed below the chest after being struck by a vehicle in a hit-and-run accident in July 2006. Today, he is able to reach a standing position, supplying the muscular push himself. He can remain standing, and bearing weight, for up to four minutes at a time (up to an hour with periodic assistance when he weakens). Aided by a harness support and some therapist assistance, he can make repeated stepping motions on a treadmill. He can also voluntarily move his toes, ankles, knees, and hips on command.

These unprecedented results were achieved through continual direct “epidural electrical stimulation” of the subject’s lower spinal cord, mimicking signals the brain normally transmits to initiate movement. Once that signal is given, the research shows, the spinal cord’s own neural network, combined with the sensory input derived from the legs to the spinal cord, is able to direct the muscle and joint movements required to stand and step with assistance on a treadmill.

The other crucial component of the research was an extensive regime of locomotor training while the spinal cord was being stimulated and the man suspended over the treadmill. Assisted by rehabilitation specialists, the man’s spinal cord neural networks were retrained to produce the muscle movements necessary to stand and to take assisted steps.

Rob Summers at Louisville’s Frazier Rehab Institute. Image Credit: Rob Summers

Leading researchers on the 11-member team are two prominent neuroscientists: Susan Harkema, of the University of Louisville’s Department of Neurosurgery, Kentucky Spinal Cord Research Center and Frazier Rehab Institute, a service of Jewish Hospital and St. Mary’s HealthCare in Louisville; and V. Reggie Edgerton, of UCLA’s Division of Life Sciences and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

Joel W. Burdick, a professor of mechanical engineering and bioengineering at Caltech, developed new electromechanical technologies and computer algorithms to aid in locomotion recovery in spinal cord injury patients. The research was funded by the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

Harkema, Edgerton, and their colleagues envision a day when at least some individuals with complete spinal cord injuries will be able to use a portable stimulation unit and, with the assistance of a walker, stand independently, maintain balance, and execute some effective stepping.

Relief from secondary complications of complete spinal cord injury – including impairment or loss of bladder control, sphincter control, and sexual response – could prove to be even more significant.

Edgerton, distinguished professor of integrative biology and physiology and of neurobiology at UCLA, said:

The spinal cord is smart. The neural networks in the lumbosacral spinal cord are capable of initiating full weight-bearing and relatively coordinated stepping without any input from the brain. This is possible, in part, due to information that is sent back from the legs directly to the spinal cord.

This sensory feedback from the feet and legs to the spinal cord facilitates the individual’s potential to balance and step through a range of speeds, directions, and levels of weight-bearing. The spinal cord can independently interpret these data and send movement instructions back to the legs – all without cortical involvement.

Harkema, a professor of neurological surgery at the University of Louisville and lead author of the study, said:

This is a breakthrough. It opens up a huge opportunity to improve the daily functioning of these individuals. But we have a long road ahead.

Edgerton concurred:

While these results are obviously encouraging, we need to be cautious. There is much work to be done.

To begin with, only one subject has been studied, and he was an athlete in extraordinary physical condition before his injury. (Five human subjects have been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration to be enrolled in the study.)

Additionally, Mr. Summers, while completely paralyzed below the chest (C7/T1 vertebra spinal section), was rated “B” on the American Spinal Injury Association’s classification system, since he did retain some feeling below the level of injury. It is not known how these interventions will work with “A”-level patients (no cognition of sensation below the injury). Another issue is the stimulation equipment itself. To date, researchers have had access only to standard off-the-shelf stimulation units designed for pain relief.

In earlier published animal studies, drug interventions further heightened the sensitivity and functioning of the spinal cord’s neural network. The compounds used in animals, however, are not approved for human use. It is likely that a large investment in further pharmacological research will be required to bring such compounds to market.

More than 5 million Americans live with some form of paralysis, defined as a central nervous system disorder resulting in difficulty or inability to move the upper or lower extremities. Roughly 1.3 million are spinal cord injured, and of those, many are completely paralyzed in the lower extremities.

Epidural stimulation, in the context of paralysis of the lower extremities, is the application of continuous electrical current, at varying frequencies and intensities, to specific locations on the lumbosacral spinal cord corresponding to the dense neural bundles that largely control movement of the hips, knees, ankles and toes. The electrodes required for this stimulation were implanted at University of Louisville Hospital by Dr. Jonathan Hodes, chairman of the department of neurosurgery at the University of Louisville.

Susan Howley, executive vice president for research at the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation, said:

Today’s announcement clearly demonstrates proof-of-concept. It’s an exciting development. Where it leads to from here is fundamentally a matter of time and money.

Rob Summers, the research volunteer, said:

This procedure has completely changed my life. For someone who for four years was unable to even move a toe, to have the freedom and ability to stand on my own is the most amazing feeling. To be able to pick up my foot and step down again was unbelievable, but beyond all of that, my sense of well-being has changed. My physique and muscle tone has improved greatly, so much that most people don’t even believe I am paralyzed. I believe that epidural stimulation will get me out of this chair.

Summary: Scientists at the University of Louisville, UCLA, and the California Institute of Technology have conducted a study of epidural electrical stimulation of the lower spinal cord of a paralyzed male volunteer – Rob Summers – at Louisville’s Frazier Rehab Institute. The results of their study are published in the May 20, 2011 online issue of The Lancet.

Via UCLA Newsroom

Tom Carmichael on drug research to help with stroke recovery