http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szyoB80GPxU

Just entering the microcosm of atom matter where it is able to absorb and emit energy, still having the possibility to obtain energy from the mass of matter which can be found everywhere.
Interestingly, E = mc² does not contain any reference to a particular substance, but there is no need, for one gram of air, water or gram per gram of cosmic particles, is also a gram of mass.
So our new role is important to release any material amount of energy in mass that surrounds us and which we use or adapt to the devices and equipment built until now

NUCLEAR FUSION AND TRAVEL FOR MARS I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAV8ORNAEuo

Why this huge energy consumption?
To overcome the planet’s gravitational field and allow a ship to travel in outer space
All bodies around the globe are attracted to Earth, the force of attraction called the gravity and acceleration with which these bodies attracted into the gravitational field is called gravitational acceleration g = 9.81 m/ s ².
Speed needed to escape Earth cosmic ship is 11000 m / s and can be done with an amount of energy of 2,400 tons of fuel
Escape speed from Earth’s surface is called the second cosmic speed.
With this speed of a ship lifts off from Earth’s surface and escapes the planet’s gravitational field.
Gravitational acceleration surface of Mars is g = 3.75 m / s ² and have an escape speed of 5100 m / s which is equivalent to a fuel quantity of 1055 tons
For a trip to outer space or on Mars was built a Kennedy Space Center, a spaceship and made available energy 2400 tons of fuel – liquid oxygen and to overcome the gravitational field of Mars that has g = 3.75 m / s ² and to return to Earth we need a space center, a spaceship and an energy of over 1055 tones of fuel – liquid oxygen

NUCLEAR FUSION AND TRAVEL FOR MARS II

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yS4VwoK23BU

Stephen Hawking’s Warning: Abandon Earth—Or Face Extinction
Let’s face it: The planet is heating up, Earth’s population is expanding at an exponential rate, and the the natural resources vital to our survival are running out faster than we can replace them with sustainable alternatives.
So, according to famed theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, it’s time to free ourselves from Mother Earth.
“I believe that the long-term future of the human race must be in space,”
“It will be difficult enough to avoid disaster on planet Earth in the next hundred years, let alone the next thousand, or million. The human race shouldn’t have all its eggs in one basket, or on one planet. Let’s hope we can avoid dropping the basket until we have spread the load.”
Solution to travel in outer space with the same ease as we do by car, bus, streetcar, subway, train, boat or plane is:
QUANTIC PROPULSED SHIP

I’ve searched a bit arround, it is sooo boring here(!),
found this page and enjoyed a lot!

This is such a great sentence “To me, NASA has always been the organization that paves the way. We should even be giving more money to NASA. They’re the ones, as a government agency, that can afford look into innovative technologies, groundbreaking technologies, things that push the limits of what we know, new types of propulsion, new ways of getting into space.”

I think, I’ll set up something to this post at my small zummondfliegen Blog, because this could be interessting for my readers, too!

Have a nice day :)

Are you serious? You quote: “So first, the SpaceX Falcon 9 LV and Dragon capsule have been designed as man rated from day one, ”

How can the Falcon9 be designed for ‘man rating’ when SpaceX doesn’t even have the man-rating requirements????

So first, the SpaceX Falcon 9 LV and Dragon capsule have been designed as man rated from day one, and they comply with every NASA standard for human rating launch vehicles that is available. Secondly, the Falcon 1 has had 5 flights, the first 3 did not reach a stable orbit, true, but they all had increasing levels of success which I feel is pretty reasonable for a brand new rocket from a brand new company. The 4th and 5th flights of the falcon 1 were successful, so it seems like they have a pretty good design at this point although more flights would add to the confidence level.

Judging by the last update on the SpaceX web site, the first Falcon 9 launch should be sometime in the next month or two, so calling them “nowhere near” resupply of the ISS doesn’t sound like the correct characterisation.

We cancelled Apollo simply because we could not afford it. We would have had to cancel Constellation eventually for the same reason. Better to do it now when we still have a chance to invest in the technologies that will make a real difference later.