EarthSky // Blogs // Space By Deborah Byrd Sep 16, 2009

Evidence for a solid, rocky world 500 light-years away

This is the first time that the density has been measured for such a small exoplanet, and the measurements suggests a solid, rocky world.

In February of 2009, astronomers announced that an Earth-orbiting satellite known as CoRoT had discovered an exoplanet orbiting around a distant star. The star was unremarkable, but its planet has become known as the smallest and fastest-orbiting of all the exoplanets known. Plus the European Southern Observatory (ESO) has announced that it has ‘firmly established’ the nature of this world as being solid and rocky, like Earth.

Astronomers – who don’t give stars the romantic names they deserve – originally called this star TYC 4799-1733-1. But they renamed it for CoRoT-7, and they called its little planet by the name CoRoT-7b, for the satellite that provided us our first earthly awareness of it.

The image at the top of this page is an artist’s impression of the star CoRoT-7 as seen from the surface of its planet. What can we glean from this image? First, notice that the planet seems very close to its star, closer than Earth is to our sun. See how big this sun looks in this planet’s sky? In fact, CoRoT-7b orbits only 2.5 million kilometers away from CoRoT-7. That’s close indeed, 23 times closer to its star than the innermost planet in our sun’s family, Mercury, is to our sun. And remember that Mercury is so close that its sun-facing surface reaches temperatures of at least 750 degrees F. or hot enough to melt some metals. So CoRoT-7b must be hot indeed on its day side. Theoretical models suggest its surface may feature lava or boiling oceans.

Mercury’s radius is 38% that of Earth, however. CoRoT-7b has a radius that is about 80% greater than Earth’s. So although I’ve been calling it ‘little,’ in fact this distant world is bigger than our home planet, almost double in size in fact.

The information about CoRoT-7b’s being solid and possibly rocky came from a long examination with an instrument called HARPS, the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher at the ESO La Silla 3.6m telescope. This instrument is dedicated to the discovery of extrasolar planets, which were unconfirmed until 1995. At this writing, there are 374 listed in the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. The HARPS instrument at the La Silla telescope has revealed CoRoT-7b’s mass as five times that of Earth’s. It’s larger in size than Earth, and more massive, so that makes sense. Combined with CoRoT-7b’s known radius, which is somewhat less than twice that of Earth, astronomers have deduced that the exoplanet’s density is quite similar to Earth’s. This is the first time that the density has been measured for such a small exoplanet, by the way, and the measurements suggests a solid, rocky world.

corot-7_starfield_250Didier Queloz, leader of the team that made the observations, called this ‘science at its thrilling and amazing best’ and who could disagree?

The star CoRoT-7 and its planet CoRoT-7b are located in the direction of our constellation of Monoceros the Unicorn, a small star pattern south of the very noticeable constellation Orion the Hunter. The photo at right shows the star field where it resides. The star is located at a distance of about 500 light-years, and it is known to be slightly smaller and cooler than our sun. CoRoT-7 is also thought to be younger than our sun at about 1.5 billion years, in contrast to 4.5 billion years for Sol.

Astronomers love systems like this one. Every 20.4 hours, the planet – CoRoT-7b – eclipses a small fraction of the light of its star for a little over one hour. The eclipse is subtle, with the light of the star diminished by only one part in 3000, but the instruments of astronomers are even more subtle, and thus they were able to detect a regular dip and rise in the star’s light and gain much information from it.

By the way, the astronomers also found in their dataset that CoRoT-7 hosts another exoplanet slightly more distant from its parent star than CoRoT-7b. They named it – of course – CoRoT-7c.

This newly discovered planet circles its host star in 3 days and 17 hours – in contrast to 365 days for Earth’s orbit around its star – and the planet has a mass about eight times that of Earth. Both CoRoT-7b and CoRoT-7c are classified as super-Earths. Unlike CoRoT-7b, this sister world does not pass in front of its star as seen from Earth, so astronomers cannot measure its radius or density.

Given these findings, CoRoT-7 stands as the first star known to have a planetary system made of two short period super-Earths with one that transits its host.

You can find more details about this star system, along with images and video, here.

Share your comments on Facebook

17 Responses to Evidence for a solid, rocky world 500 light-years away

  1. mike says:

    What a great find! Now find a cure for cancer. Which do YOU think is more important. The solar system and technology will be there 10000000 years from now. Priority levels of our government. Again…..our money well spent.

    • Mike2 says:

      Replay to mikes re post is that if Insurances and republicans would run the NASA, ESA and other agencies we still would think that earth is flat….wake up mike it if we would have cure for cancer than we would not need for insurances and billion republicans would get poor as the cancer patients!

  2. Rubylikeaflame says:

    Mike, where’s your sense of wonder?! New horizons, my friend!

  3. mike says:

    Wonder? I wonder the things I could have done with all the people who I knew that were lost to cancer. I understand the importance of space exploration and due respect to astronauts and scientists, but really, how much was spent on this new discovery?

  4. Someone That Reads says:

    Mike, if you had done just a little research, or even read this article, you would have noticed that this was not an American discovery. So, when you say something like, priority levels of our government, make sure you know what you\’re talking about. If you want to get mad at our government, get mad for the fact that we spend $1.5 trillion on military, more than half of our budget, and the remaining $1.2 trillion is left for everything else.

  5. Psyphi says:

    The National Cancer Institute’s budget for FY 2008 was $4.83 billion.

    NASA’s Astrophysics FY 2008 budget was $1.2 billion.
    The NSF funded Astronomy in 2008 at $218 million.

    So cancer research gets nearly 5 billion, while Astronomy gets less than 1.5 billion.

    I don’t see what your problem is? Except that we haven’t cured cancer yet. Looks to me like they’re spending enough on it though.

  6. Psyphi says:

    @Someone That Reads – Good point. If a budget needs to be cut for cancer research, cut the military budget. We should cut the military budget in half and increase funding for everything else by 50%.

  7. Mike says:

    my best friend in the whole world just died from cancer. reading the new discovery and reacting the way i did was for obvious reasons. you all made good points but i still back the fact that that cancer research right now is more important than planet hunting or funding someone elses war.

    • MekhongKurt says:

      Mike, knowing about your friend casts your other comments in a vastly different light. Having lost dear friends and relatives to cancer over the decades (plus having had skin cancer myself), I can identify with your sense of loss and despair.

      Considering how relatively small the budget is for our various space efforts — some of which have given us unexpected breakthroughs in medicine, by the way — I would say that’s not where the cut should come from. We could start with pork, which I think this year ran somewhere around $20 billion — a bunch, anyway. The military is another place, in terms of the way we handle defense contracts, i.e., we don’t hold contractors to performance checkpoints — and, thus, get hit with enormous cost overruns. (That doesn’t mean I want our military without a single thing they need, including decent creature comfort items.)

      And Rosette, how nice of you to offer condolences. I salute you.

  8. Rosette Cordoba says:

    Mike, we at EarthSky are so sorry for your loss. Your response is completely understandable. Thank you for visiting this website and for starting this valuable discussion.

    Take care,
    Rosette

  9. mike says:

    plus…now that we found that planet that is i don’t know how many katrillion miles away…now what? did nothing for me or the homeless problem. it’s about the people of the world and making it a better place. this discovery although “scientifically important” did not help the cause.

    • Rosette Cordoba says:

      Yes. I understand how you feel. But the same can be said of all astronomical studies. And yet our world would be poorer without them.

  10. mina says:

    So good to know about a possible world, thank you!!!

  11. ariana says:

    I’m 10 and i was wondering if anyone knows what the name of the sun Corot-exo-7b’s or more?

  12. Person says:

    Even if we were able to reach an outside world like this and it had life, we would never really be able to study it. The contamination to both our worlds would surly kill everything living.

  13. BENJ says:

    What is the temperature of COROT-7b on it’s non-illuminated side?

  14. Beth says:

    This is so cool I am studying this planet!

Share your comments on EarthSky

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>