<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kevin Trenberth says there&#8217;s less water flowing in world&#8217;s rivers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthsky.org/interviewhome/53307/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow</link>
	<description>A Clear Voice for Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:38:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/comment-page-1#comment-49560</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=12439#comment-49560</guid>
		<description>In the future water will become more valuable than oil. Much more so, we definitely need to watch our water supplies and prepare early for what will eventually be a key resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the future water will become more valuable than oil. Much more so, we definitely need to watch our water supplies and prepare early for what will eventually be a key resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metin2yang</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/comment-page-1#comment-20216</link>
		<dc:creator>metin2yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=12439#comment-20216</guid>
		<description>thanks share your artic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks share your artic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bachir</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/comment-page-1#comment-15631</link>
		<dc:creator>Bachir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=12439#comment-15631</guid>
		<description>correction: doesn&#039;t surprise me...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction: doesn&#8217;t surprise me&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bachir</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/comment-page-1#comment-15630</link>
		<dc:creator>Bachir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=12439#comment-15630</guid>
		<description>It is easily understandable why such an event in my opinion is taking place; climate change due to greenhouse effect is the cause of lowering river flow. To illustrate an example, I live in Montreal, I remember winters and summers of my childhood (now 25 yrs old); heavy snow in winter,with cold and normal summers with rain, believe me climate change is really happening winters for the past three years mild, little snow, summers cool and gray days without rain... Call me paranoid, but with all the gazes and pollutions,etc we are &quot;falsifying&quot; the Universe, taking it in the wrong direction; so finding out about low water in rivers does surprise me... (Good article by the way. First comment on this site.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is easily understandable why such an event in my opinion is taking place; climate change due to greenhouse effect is the cause of lowering river flow. To illustrate an example, I live in Montreal, I remember winters and summers of my childhood (now 25 yrs old); heavy snow in winter,with cold and normal summers with rain, believe me climate change is really happening winters for the past three years mild, little snow, summers cool and gray days without rain&#8230; Call me paranoid, but with all the gazes and pollutions,etc we are &#8220;falsifying&#8221; the Universe, taking it in the wrong direction; so finding out about low water in rivers does surprise me&#8230; (Good article by the way. First comment on this site.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.RAVI</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/comment-page-1#comment-15433</link>
		<dc:creator>K.RAVI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=12439#comment-15433</guid>
		<description>I want to know more about the above topic. I want to know that it is cause for the earth quakes or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know more about the above topic. I want to know that it is cause for the earth quakes or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lakotah</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/comment-page-1#comment-14881</link>
		<dc:creator>Lakotah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=12439#comment-14881</guid>
		<description>Let me see if I get this right. We have global warming thats melting the ice caps and glaciers, so the oceans water level should go up. But the river flows are getting less, so this must mean that all rivers don&#039;t run to the sea as the old saying goes cause the rising oceans would be running back up stream and creating quite a mess which they are not. So if it&#039;s not raining or snowing to make the rivers flow that waters gotta be some where. Hmmm. So this leads me to the conclusion that either we are bottling too much drinking water or because all humans are, what is it 90% water?, that maybe we may have too many over weight humans holding too much water. But that can&#039;t be right, humans are very small compared to the size of the earth. Where is all this water going? Maybe Hugo Chavez was right, we need to spend less time in the shower and enough of all that singing already. Honestly, I wish somebody would make up their minds and stop all this nonsense about water.I&#039;m getting thirsty now. I&#039;m gonna go have a beer.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me see if I get this right. We have global warming thats melting the ice caps and glaciers, so the oceans water level should go up. But the river flows are getting less, so this must mean that all rivers don&#8217;t run to the sea as the old saying goes cause the rising oceans would be running back up stream and creating quite a mess which they are not. So if it&#8217;s not raining or snowing to make the rivers flow that waters gotta be some where. Hmmm. So this leads me to the conclusion that either we are bottling too much drinking water or because all humans are, what is it 90% water?, that maybe we may have too many over weight humans holding too much water. But that can&#8217;t be right, humans are very small compared to the size of the earth. Where is all this water going? Maybe Hugo Chavez was right, we need to spend less time in the shower and enough of all that singing already. Honestly, I wish somebody would make up their minds and stop all this nonsense about water.I&#8217;m getting thirsty now. I&#8217;m gonna go have a beer.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REBECCAcP21</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/comment-page-1#comment-14878</link>
		<dc:creator>REBECCAcP21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=12439#comment-14878</guid>
		<description>I think that you seem to be the most experienced information’ associated with this good post or about &lt;a href=&quot;http://bestwritingservice.com/write-my-essay.html&quot;&gt;write my essay&lt;/a&gt; accomplisher. And you have to be hired by the &lt;a  href=&quot;http://www.bestwritingservice.com&quot;&gt;writing services&lt;/a&gt; to compose such kind of imazing custom essays. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you seem to be the most experienced information’ associated with this good post or about <a href="http://bestwritingservice.com/write-my-essay.html">write my essay</a> accomplisher. And you have to be hired by the <a href="http://www.bestwritingservice.com">writing services</a> to compose such kind of imazing custom essays. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Earl Salmony</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/kevin-trenberth-explains-why-rivers-are-losing-water-flow/comment-page-1#comment-14849</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Earl Salmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=12439#comment-14849</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that any &quot;truth&quot; about climate science needs to be coupled with the best available science about human population dynamics and the human overpopulation of Earth.

When the moment of &#039;throwing out life preservers&#039; occurs, it will probably be too late for human action to do anything meaningful about the human-forced global threats that loom ominously before the human family. Time will have been wasted. We will have been fiddlin&#039; while Earth&#039;s ecology was destabilizing and its resources were being recklessly dissipated. Father Greed could be seen ravaging Mother Nature. Global threats had called out to leaders for global interventions, but there were no transformational leaders (except Barack Obama) and international institutions (including the United Nations) empowered with adequate authority to promote necessary change. 

At bottom, many too many leading environmentalists, politicians, economic powerbrokers and other public opinion shapers colluded in stony silence and did not speak out loudly and clearly about the colossal threat that is posed to humanity by the skyrocketing growth of human population numbers on Earth.

Despite the unfortunate, inhumane ways a &quot;ONE CHILD PER FAMILY&quot; policy was implemented in China, the policy could be vital for the future of humankind and life as we know it in our planetary home. The immediate, free, universal and compassionate implementation of a voluntary &quot;one child per family&quot; policy could decisively limit adverse, human-driven impacts on Earth&#039;s body and its environs, and do so more powerfully than any other conceivable human intervention.

Given the visible, converging global threats to human and environmental health that were presented to the family of humanity, the humane implementation of one child per family could have been an indispensible centerpiece of a set of adequately designed, actionable programs that served to actually rescue a good enough future for the children and coming generations.

If a root cause of the global threats on humanity&#039;s horizon, now and then, is the unbridled growth of absolute global human population numbers, our willful denial of this primary cause could make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the children to reasonably address and sensibly overcome these threats. Then the children are likely being directed down a &quot;primrose path&quot; to confront some unimaginable kind of ecological wreckage, the likes of which only Ozymandias has seen. When the life preservers have to be deployed, the children will not understand why the catastrophe is occurring. Because their elders refused to acknowledge the best available scientific evidence of human population dynamics and the human overpopulation of Earth and, therewith, to &quot;diagnose&quot; adequately certain distinctly human-induced global dangers to human wellbeing and environmental health, the children will not know what hit them, why it is happening, and what is required of them so as not to commit the same mistakes made by the elders.

This is only a guess but please note the likelihood that history will not be kind to the woefully inadequate leadership provided by my not-so-great generation of arrogant, extremely foolish and avaricious elders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that any &#8220;truth&#8221; about climate science needs to be coupled with the best available science about human population dynamics and the human overpopulation of Earth.</p>
<p>When the moment of &#8216;throwing out life preservers&#8217; occurs, it will probably be too late for human action to do anything meaningful about the human-forced global threats that loom ominously before the human family. Time will have been wasted. We will have been fiddlin&#8217; while Earth&#8217;s ecology was destabilizing and its resources were being recklessly dissipated. Father Greed could be seen ravaging Mother Nature. Global threats had called out to leaders for global interventions, but there were no transformational leaders (except Barack Obama) and international institutions (including the United Nations) empowered with adequate authority to promote necessary change. </p>
<p>At bottom, many too many leading environmentalists, politicians, economic powerbrokers and other public opinion shapers colluded in stony silence and did not speak out loudly and clearly about the colossal threat that is posed to humanity by the skyrocketing growth of human population numbers on Earth.</p>
<p>Despite the unfortunate, inhumane ways a &#8220;ONE CHILD PER FAMILY&#8221; policy was implemented in China, the policy could be vital for the future of humankind and life as we know it in our planetary home. The immediate, free, universal and compassionate implementation of a voluntary &#8220;one child per family&#8221; policy could decisively limit adverse, human-driven impacts on Earth&#8217;s body and its environs, and do so more powerfully than any other conceivable human intervention.</p>
<p>Given the visible, converging global threats to human and environmental health that were presented to the family of humanity, the humane implementation of one child per family could have been an indispensible centerpiece of a set of adequately designed, actionable programs that served to actually rescue a good enough future for the children and coming generations.</p>
<p>If a root cause of the global threats on humanity&#8217;s horizon, now and then, is the unbridled growth of absolute global human population numbers, our willful denial of this primary cause could make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the children to reasonably address and sensibly overcome these threats. Then the children are likely being directed down a &#8220;primrose path&#8221; to confront some unimaginable kind of ecological wreckage, the likes of which only Ozymandias has seen. When the life preservers have to be deployed, the children will not understand why the catastrophe is occurring. Because their elders refused to acknowledge the best available scientific evidence of human population dynamics and the human overpopulation of Earth and, therewith, to &#8220;diagnose&#8221; adequately certain distinctly human-induced global dangers to human wellbeing and environmental health, the children will not know what hit them, why it is happening, and what is required of them so as not to commit the same mistakes made by the elders.</p>
<p>This is only a guess but please note the likelihood that history will not be kind to the woefully inadequate leadership provided by my not-so-great generation of arrogant, extremely foolish and avaricious elders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

