<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private: Will U.S. presidential candidates debate science policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthsky.org/interviewhome/52432/will-presidential-candidates-debate-science-policy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthsky.org/human-world/will-presidential-candidates-debate-science-policy</link>
	<description>A Clear Voice for Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: a p garcia</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/human-world/will-presidential-candidates-debate-science-policy/comment-page-1#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>a p garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=1778#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;Presidental canidates debate science- Wishing for a pot of Gold at the end of the rainbow is more realistic than having them debate science.  After all a degree in Jurisprudence is not science!  I wouldn&#8217;t support them because a lawyer is &#8220;A&#8221; moral.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presidental canidates debate science- Wishing for a pot of Gold at the end of the rainbow is more realistic than having them debate science.  After all a degree in Jurisprudence is not science!  I wouldn&#8217;t support them because a lawyer is &#8220;A&#8221; moral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ismacku</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/human-world/will-presidential-candidates-debate-science-policy/comment-page-1#comment-4707</link>
		<dc:creator>ismacku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=1778#comment-4707</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;I say spend more money on Nasa then this stupid idea. Only your instroments have noticed a change. No animal can notice a chage in the climate. The Earth has cooled and warmed many times. uring the 1200s there was a cooling period that caused people to stay inside more and causing the black plague. Also before that period there was a warm period  where greenland was actually green and sheep could live there. In this forum people talk about a mini ice age age which shows people dont affect the climate. http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=90232&lt;br /&gt;
then the Earth warmed up again without the help of pollution.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say spend more money on Nasa then this stupid idea. Only your instroments have noticed a change. No animal can notice a chage in the climate. The Earth has cooled and warmed many times. uring the 1200s there was a cooling period that caused people to stay inside more and causing the black plague. Also before that period there was a warm period  where greenland was actually green and sheep could live there. In this forum people talk about a mini ice age age which shows people dont affect the climate. <a href="http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=90232" rel="nofollow">http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=90232</a><br />
then the Earth warmed up again without the help of pollution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
