EarthSky // Blogs // Health By Deborah Byrd May 03, 2009

Swine flu preparedness. I vote yes.

Viruses mutate. Conditions can change quickly. Is a pandemic imminent, as a Phase 5 alert level suggests?

CDC Image[/caption]Last week the World Health Organization (WHO) raised the pandemic alert level to Phase 5, its second-highest level, the level just before a full-blown pandemic phase. Today, just before posting to this blog, there are 226 U.S. human cases of H1N1 flu infection, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

As the CDC reports, since January of this year, 13,000 people in the U.S. have died from the regular flu – while, as of this writing, only one person in the U.S. has died of swine flu.

Why did the health experts jump to Phase 5 on swine flu? The answer is that these experts – who are charged with keeping the rest of us safe – have a system, and they’re trying to follow it. Here’s the official definition of Phase 5, from the WHO. Phase 5 is “characterized by human-to-human spread of the virus into at least two countries in one WHO region. While most countries will not be affected at this stage, the declaration of Phase 5 is a strong signal that a pandemic is imminent and that the time to finalize the organization, communication, and implementation of the planned mitigation measures is short.”

And here’s a statement by WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan, issued on April 29. Among many other things, Chan said, “Let me remind you. New diseases are, by definition, poorly understood. Influenza viruses are notorious for their rapid mutation and unpredictable behavior.”

Viruses mutate. Conditions can change quickly. Is a pandemic imminent, as a Phase 5 alert level suggests? At this writing, the WHO has not lowered the alert level. No one knows what will happen.

Marsha Canright, director of media relations at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston explained other factors that set off the current concern about the H1N1 virus. Swine flu, she said, “has that ‘red flag’ characteristic of attacking young, strong people unlike a more typical flu which is … more likely to cause death in the very old and very young.”

Attacking able-bodied young people was a characteristic of the Spanish Flu – caused by a particularly deadly and virulent strain of the H1N1 virus – in 1918. The Spanish Flu caused the last major pandemic, which began in March of 1918 and raged around the globe for about two years, killing as many as 100 million – or more than twice the number of people killed in World War I.

Canright also said, “Concerns about this new swine flu (at least from scientists here) are that people lack any real immunity from the strain so we don’t get the pleasant benefits of herd immunity or protection from past vaccines, as far as we know … Scientists are starting to look at the molecular makeup of this flu and hope to find similarities with existing vaccines. It takes time to grow a vaccine and they need to get on it …”

Health experts say a serious and deadly pandemic is inevitable, but this particular strain of swine flu has not been very deadly so far. Again, as of today, 226 have been affected in the U.S., with only one death. If this flu does not cause a deadly pandemic, then are steps being taken by the WHO and CDC a waste of time? Are they just trying to scare us? Is it a left-winged government plot? Or could it be a dress rehearsal for a real pandemic?

Share your comments on Facebook

4 Responses to Swine flu preparedness. I vote yes.

  1. Claudia Crowley says:

    Considering all, they did the right thing. They can always back it off again when the flu proves not a problem. Or run it up to six if things get worse.

    Interesting use of Twitter. Thanks for posting that.

  2. deborahbyrd says:

    Yes, I had been wondering about Twitter. It’s great for a purpose like this, though.

    Thanks for visiting Claudia!

  3. Benjamin Napier says:

    It is my opinion that the whole swine flu “crisis” was a contrived one. And badly so. This was simply an excercise to see how compliant Amercians are and to see if any of the martial law ideas will work. And we failed. Largely, I think, due to a complete lack of math or science education in our public schools.

    If this were a real problem being dealt with by rational, coherent, statists, with the goal of stopping the spread of a flue virus known to be in Mexico, they would have immediately closed the border with Mexico and controlled travel in the border region. They didn’t. Why? Stupid? Or not worried? Take your pick. Once again we ahve been ahd by government trying to run our lives with no regard to science or intelligence.

    I will reiterate: “If government is the answer, it is a stupid question.”

    If you wish to be protected gainst something, you must take the precautions to protect yourself. If this were a real, virulent virus capable of creating an epidemic, continuing to consort with folks on trains, in malls and the like, would have resulted in wholesale death. It did not and for that I am thankful.

  4. deborahbyrd says:

    Ben, as to why they did not close the border …

    Here are a couple of posts from CDCEmergency on Twitter, that I didn’t include above:

    0:33 PM Apr 25th from web
    As part of swine flu investigation, CDC has deployed 7 staff to CA, 1 to TX, 2 to Mexico: http://bit.ly/nI9X3 #swineflu1

    2:19 PM Apr 26th from web
    CDC testing shows U.S. strain & Mexico strain of swine flu virus are genetic match. http://bit.ly/kgu8l #swineflu

    Note the dates, April 25 and 26. Then check the timeline above. You’ll see that by April 25 – when scientists were still grappling to understand what was happening – there were already a growing number of cases of swine flu in the U.S. Thus closing the border would not have accomplished anything.

    We live in an imperfect world. People try their best on most levels, I believe, but it’s probably best not to expect perfection from scientists or anyone else. Sure, it would have been ideal if scientists had understood this disease in time to close the border before it spread to the U.S. But that didn’t happen.

    All the best,

    Deborah

Share your comments on EarthSky

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>