EarthSky › FoodInterviews

Tom Tomich says global sustainability starts with food

Print
November 23rd, 2009 - Food

Tom Tomich is director of the Agricultural Sustainability Institute at the University of California – Davis. At a fall 2009 meeting of agricultural experts at Columbia University, he talked to EarthSky about how he believes global sustainability begins with food.

Sustainability is about how we’re going to provide basic needs for healthy living for billions of people on the planet now – and then continue doing this into the future for our growing population. Tomich, who’s an agricultural economist, approaches sustainability by looking at how food is produced – he calls agriculture a “tangible lens” for sustainability issues, because we all eat food.

Tomich talked about what it takes to make a slice of the bread you find in the store. It involves fertilizers to grow wheat, cultivating the fields, transporting the wheat, processing it into flour, and distributing it to stores. He said each step takes a lot of energy, or fossil fuels, which drive climate change. That’s a big concern in agriculture today, he said. He also said that agriculture is responsible for 1/3 of the world’s greenhouse gases.

Tomich said our food sustainability challenges are not just environmental, but economic. He added that in terms of percentage of income, Americans spend less on food than anyone on the planet, ever – only 10 dollars out of every 100 dollars earned. But he said even in America, some people don’t have the means to eat well.

Tom Tomich: We still have large numbers of families, large numbers of children who don’t have access to enough healthy food. That’s partly because of poverty, and partly because of the relationship between poverty and communities. For example, whether they have grocery stores in their neighborhoods, whether those grocery stores stock healthy food on their shelves, whether there’s public transportation to get to those grocery stores.

He said hunger is deeply rooted to these social sustainability problems.

Tom Tomich: Here’s a global example – the billion or so people who are not getting enough to eat. They don’t have enough income, or they’re producing enough food to have minimum threshold of a healthy life. For me, it’s clear that is a sustainability challenge as well. In other words, meeting the food needs of our whole planet. It’s not just economics, or the environmental impacts, although those are important – but it’s also about the distribution of food.

Tomich also expressed concern about the amount of food – and consequently, energy – wasted by wasting food.

Tom Tomich: The amazing thing is because we waste so much food we are in essence throwing out that energy and with all of what it means in terms of fossil fuel dependence and greenhouse gas emissions. There are many pieces, and you have to break them down through the whole cycle.

He added that some estimates indicate up to 1/3 of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions come from the food system, including agricultural production and related deforestation.

7 Responses to “Tom Tomich says global sustainability starts with food”

  1. Benjamin Napier says:

    Poverty is caused by socialism and a lack of a work ethic. We have spent enough money on the “War on Poverty: since its inception to give every “poor person” about $300,000 per year. If we were to encourage property ownership and remove the hammock folks are used to laying in, things would improve greatly.

    The CO2 thing is a joke. Increased CO2 levels will increase plant growth rate and increase food production. Since global warming would also increase plant growth rates, that is also a non issue. However, since the earth is actually cooling, there should be concern for agriculture in the higher latitutdes. Government is the CAUSE of hunger and poverty, not the cure.

    • Joel Leppard says:

      Benjamin-
      I wasn\’t aware that we\’ve spent enough to give every poor person $300,000. I\’d definitely be interested in reading that report, please send it to me, if possible. Assuming that living on $1 per day is \”poor\”, then there is are 1.5 billion poor. Rough calculations would put expenditures on the \’War on Poverty\’ at 1.5 billion x 300,000= $450 trillion.

  2. Benjamin Napier says:

    As to the “global warming” myth. I think nearly everyone is aware of the scandal breaking about the East Anglia University fraud case. We mustn’t condone breaking and entering, nor can we “ACORN” this and try to hide the original crime by dinigrating the whistleblowers. The entire global warning fallacy has been based on criminal doctoring of data to achieve a political goal. And millions of stolen US tax dollars were used in the deception. Heads should roll over this.

    Sciece must be objsective. Or it is not science. If you will not release your data and method for REAL peer review, you have something to hide. “We the people” have been taken to the cleaners and the politica;l powers that be are still moving forward,

    You are not in danger from AGW or human caused “climate change”. You are in danger from criminal politicians and the criminals who have bought and paid for them.

  3. star says:

    Hey tom

  4. ZARUBA says:

    what a great better business scam

  5. I know that growing more crops would make more people less hungry, but surely the worlds problems stem from over population and not just shoddy catering practices. The level of infant survival rate effects the number of children that a family will have. Suddenly feeding everyone will save lives in the short term, but imagine a world where all of the children that would have died of malnutrition, now live and grow up to have families of their own. There will become a point where we are back to square one again.

    There needs to be careful management of food and water supply, sanitation, health care and there definitely needs to be a balanced approach to population control to adequately control future population growth.

  6. yeah, i agree with you about food sustainability issues, because we all eat food

Leave a Reply