<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeremy O&#8217;Brien on why some items can be recycled, but not others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthsky.org/earth/why-cant-everything-be-recycled/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/why-cant-everything-be-recycled</link>
	<description>A Clear Voice for Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Napier</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/why-cant-everything-be-recycled/comment-page-1#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Napier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=2760#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;If an item or commmodity is cheap and ubiquitous, there is no reason to recycle it. Unless, like aluminum, it is cheaper to recycle than to process bauxite.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It is allabout economics. The environment is OK. The real deal is, can you affort the product?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If an item or commmodity is cheap and ubiquitous, there is no reason to recycle it. Unless, like aluminum, it is cheaper to recycle than to process bauxite.</p>
<p>It is allabout economics. The environment is OK. The real deal is, can you affort the product?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

