<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Barry on new technologies to capture carbon dioxide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthsky.org/earth/shell-exec-speaks-on-carbon-capture-and-storage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/shell-exec-speaks-on-carbon-capture-and-storage</link>
	<description>A Clear Voice for Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenny</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/shell-exec-speaks-on-carbon-capture-and-storage/comment-page-1#comment-173726</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=4183#comment-173726</guid>
		<description>I was like mark, didn&#039;t really see the problem.. appreciate the reply Sinead


Shouts to Jorge Salazar, good job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was like mark, didn&#8217;t really see the problem.. appreciate the reply Sinead</p>
<p>Shouts to Jorge Salazar, good job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinead m</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/shell-exec-speaks-on-carbon-capture-and-storage/comment-page-1#comment-15055</link>
		<dc:creator>sinead m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=4183#comment-15055</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,
As no-one has responded to your comment-i thought i&#039;d try to!
i&#039;m a final yr science student, doing a module in atmospheric chemistry.
And, yes CO2 is actually listed as one of the pollutants damaging the quality of urban air. it is released from the combustion of fossil fuels in power stations. Main sectors that relaease it is: transport, industrial and domestic.
it is produced naturally also by the decay of vegetation, volcanic eruptions, respiration etc. it has a ressidence time of about 100yrs in the atmosphere. it is cause for concern because it causes the green house effect, along with other chemicals of course.
the greenhouse effect is simply, chemicals (such as CO2) absorbing the infrared radiation and re-emitting it. this leads to the warming up of the earth&#039;s surface and the troposphere.
i hope this helps ya!but i&#039;m no expert!!!
Sinead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,<br />
As no-one has responded to your comment-i thought i&#8217;d try to!<br />
i&#8217;m a final yr science student, doing a module in atmospheric chemistry.<br />
And, yes CO2 is actually listed as one of the pollutants damaging the quality of urban air. it is released from the combustion of fossil fuels in power stations. Main sectors that relaease it is: transport, industrial and domestic.<br />
it is produced naturally also by the decay of vegetation, volcanic eruptions, respiration etc. it has a ressidence time of about 100yrs in the atmosphere. it is cause for concern because it causes the green house effect, along with other chemicals of course.<br />
the greenhouse effect is simply, chemicals (such as CO2) absorbing the infrared radiation and re-emitting it. this leads to the warming up of the earth&#8217;s surface and the troposphere.<br />
i hope this helps ya!but i&#8217;m no expert!!!<br />
Sinead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://earthsky.org/earth/shell-exec-speaks-on-carbon-capture-and-storage/comment-page-1#comment-2812</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.96.63.114/?p=4183#comment-2812</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;Educate me, please!  Carbon Dioxide is what green things like trees and plants intake for photosynthesis, isn&#8217;t it.  Why are we calling it dangerous?  I need a clear answer to this.  I&#8217;m not seeing a problem.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;thx,&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;mb&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Educate me, please!  Carbon Dioxide is what green things like trees and plants intake for photosynthesis, isn&#8217;t it.  Why are we calling it dangerous?  I need a clear answer to this.  I&#8217;m not seeing a problem.</p>
<p>thx,</p>
<p>mb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

