Climate expert Chris Field said that there’s a historic shift occurring in terms of where the world’s greenhouse gases are being produced. Dr. Field is founding director of the Department of Global Ecology at the Carnegie Institution for Science.
Chris Field: We’re in a period of rapid transition, moving away from the history in which most of the greenhouse gas emissions came from activities from rich countries in the northern hemisphere, toward an environment in which the most rapid growth and increasingly the greatest fraction of the emissions are tending to come from developing countries like China, India.
A 2008 report by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency found that China’s greenhouse gas emissions were over ten percent higher than those of the United States. The Agency first discovered China to be the world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases in 2006. Dr. Field said that, in the coming years, he expects to see increased emissions from other developing regions, like South America and Africa.
Chris Field: Countries that don’t necessarily have the economic resources to invest in strategies that cut down their greenhouse gas emissions.
Field hopes that poor and wealthy countries can cooperate on solutions for reducing emissions.
Chris Field: But they’re going to involve hard decisions about who pays for what aspects, and who accepts constraints on the rate on which they either deploy new technologies or develop economically. These are among the most challenging questions a country can face.
Dr. Field added that the rapidly developing countries have the opportunity to develop cleaner energy, especially since they have less infrastructure in place. Field said the landscape of how many countries will think about the actions they’re going to take are really complicated for at least two very different kind of reasons.
Chris Field: One reason it’s complicated is because we know there’s big opportunity in developing the energy infrastructure of the 21st century and I think every country – the United States, India, China all want to be involved in leaders in developing that technology.
He said the other reason is because the poor nations are, with their increased manufacturing, becoming bigger polluters. He likes to think the rich nations can help poorer nations pollute less, while still allowing them to grow economically.
Chris Field: If we can find a way to take advantage of the opportunities that the wealthy countries have and that the poor countries have in order to work together, there should be some truly spectacular things that are possible.
It seems to me that everyone loves talking in floscules and repeating what has been said many times without actually saying anything.
Many of us know that manufacture of the ”richer” part of the world has shifted into countries giving incentives to companies from ”richer” countries in order to develop. There is a direct link in the demand of production from these companies that are still based with their tertiary and quaternary staff in the country of origin. Not only is the labour force being paid less in developing countries but is also going to face economic penalization for the consequences of producing for the richer world. Great way to keep them in the ”developing” box.
I’d like to call it the “exploited” box. The western consumeristic economy has spread around the globe, with the developed countries at the top of the food pyramid and the less developed, rather less powerful, providing resources upward. These resources include humans and their indigenous habitats. It is the West that needs to change its philosophy of consumption, whether out of humanitarian ethic or preservation of progeny. But the logical response is re-engineer Western values.
I guess Nature’s most plentiful greenhouse gas (water vapor) is OK even though it is more potent than CO2.
We have nothing to worry about as far as mankind’s producing “greenhouse gasses” is concerned. The climate is cyclical and is controled by the sun. It has been much warmer than it is now, and much colder. CO2 has been much higher in the distant past with no inout from man. What we do need to worry about is the government control of our energy sources and economies. Government policies can destroy our economies and cause a cultrual meltdown. Starvation, famine and war will result.
[...] a recent interview, scientist and director of Carnegie’s Department of Global Ecology, Chris Field, describes [...]