EarthSky › Human WorldInterviews

Private: Author: “Rachel Carson never called for DDT ban”

Print
May 27th, 2007 - Human World

_Last week, Oklahoma senator “Tom Coburn”:http://coburn.senate.gov/public/ effectively “blocked a resolution”:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/22/AR2007052201574.html to honor environmental author Rachel Carson on the 100th anniversary of her birth. Carson, who died in 1964, would have turned 100 on May 27, 2007. In blocking the resolution, the Oklahoma senator asserted that Carson’s warnings about environmental damage have put a stigma on potentially lifesaving pesticides, including DDT. Others in addition to Coburn have criticized Carson, arguing that restrictions placed on DDT after the publication of her book Silent Spring ultimately caused needless deaths around the world from malaria. Still others have called those criticisms, and Coburn’s actions, “political and misguided.”:http://scholarsandrogues.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/senators-attack-on-carsons-silent-spring-political-misguided/ Linda Lear is the author of Carson’s biography, called “Witness for Nature”:http://www.amazon.com/Rachel-Carson-Witness-Linda-Lear/dp/0805034285. Lear kindly granted to Earth & Sky’s readers this statement on the blocking of the resolution to honor Rachel Carson._

Rachel Carson would be one hundred years old on Sunday, May 27.

A nature writer and ecologist whose lyric writing made the science of oceanography understandable to the general public in her international best selling book, The Sea Around Us (1951), Carson never wavered in her desire to make us aware of our connectedness to the natural world. Writing in a time before ecology was recognized as a science, Rachel Carson wanted to instill in us a “sense of wonder” so compelling that we would lose our appetite for destruction and care for the perpetuation of the natural world that sustains us all. She died in 1964 just eighteen-months after her landmark book Silent Spring was published. It was a book about death, our own and potentially nature’s, by a woman who was committed to the continuation of all life.

Silent Spring has been called many things over the past forty-five years. For many, it was the book that began the environmental movement of the 20th century; the book which sounded the alarm over human kind’s ability to alter nature and thus our planet’s future irrevocably. To others it was polemic which overstated the case for the damage caused by the use of synthetic chemical pesticides.

The truth is that Rachel Carson never called for the banning of DDT and never suggested in Silent Spring that pesticides not be used. Her research suggested that chemical pesticides were being used inefficiently, ineffectively and indiscriminately. (If a little was good, a lot more was better.) She worried about the chemical mixture that was being laid on the land and its ultimate the effects on soil, water, animal and human life — in the long run.

The US did not ban the domestic application of DDT until January 1972. It never banned the domestic manufacture or export of DDT or of its latter day sister synthetic pesticides. DDT has continued to be exported, used and misused, in almost every country around the globe. It is found in every atoll island, in every ice cap, and in the liver of most species of birds and fish. Insects, especially those mosquitos carrying infectious diseases like malaria quickly became resistant to DDT, and the disease returned, and will continue to return. But to assign responsibility to Rachel Carson or her writings for the persistence of malaria is a tragic misrepresentation of her book and her ideals, as well as deeply misinformed science.

Carson hoped that technology, eg. pesticides, would be used responsibility. She believed that the “obligation to endure” gave us the right to question not just whether a thing could be done, but whether it should be done. This desire to perpetuate life is Carson’s deepest legacy, and it is one which we should celebrate today. – Linda Lear

“Rachel Carson website”:http://www.rachelcarson.org/

“Courage for the Earth: Writers, Scientists, and Activists Celebrate the Life and Writing of Rachel Carson”:http://www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com/catalog/titledetail.cfm?titleNumber=694257

“Witness For Nature”:http://www.amazon.com/Rachel-Carson-Witness-Linda-Lear/dp/0805034285
A biography of Rachel Carson by Linda Lear

“Silent Spring”:http://www.amazon.com/Silent-Spring-Rachel-Carson/dp/0618249060

“The Story of Silent Spring”:http://www.nrdc.org/health/pesticides/hcarson.asp from the National Resources Defense Council

“There’s Poison All Around Us Now”:http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/10/05/reviews/carson-spring.html, a 1962 review of Carson’s book Silent Spring in the New York Review of Books.

“Excerpts from the writing of Rachel Carson”:http://www.fws.gov/northeast/rachelcarson/excerpts.html

“On the shoulders of giants”:http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/Giants/Carson/Carson3.html, an article about Carson and her work from NASA’s Earth Observatory

Our thanks to:
Linda Lear
Biographer of Rachel Carson

6 Responses to “Private: Author: “Rachel Carson never called for DDT ban””

  1. Dr. True says:

    With a healthy respect for common sense, this quote seems appropriate.
    “Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself.”
    -Mark Twain

  2. Dear Friends,

    Rachel Carson has been villified in same the way many other great scientists have been severely rebuked by the “powers that be” for reporting unwelcome but good scientific evidence.

    The powerbrokers of the global economy, the megalomaniacal heads of multinational corporations, their bought-and-paid-for politicians, and their many minions in the mass media reject at every turn good scientific evidence, if the findings disturb their unbridled and patently unsustainable consumption and production activities, the ones now rampantly overspreading the surface of our planetary home and threatening the Earth as a fit place for human habitation by our children and coming generations.

    Politicians in our time are helping themselves, to be sure; but they are surely failing our great society by providing woefully inadequate services to democracy.

    Politicians can be found anywhere. Pray tell me, where are to find the likes of so accurate an observer and so great a scientist as Rachel Carson? If you see the likes of Rachel Carson among those in my not-so-great generations of elders, please send word to me.

    Sincerely,

    Steve

  3. true, the lies about DDT are groundless, Dr. Michael Crichton, knows, he convinced me,
    as it is still sorely needed in such areas as where I live Central America
    I detest pesticides but this IS a LIFESAVER in regards to malaria and its horrible ills, in this case the cure is not as bad as the disease

  4. Deborah Byrd says:

    Michael, agreed. Much needs to be done in tropical countries to aid the problem of mosquito-borne disease. But to blame Rachel Carson – to vilify her – to accuse her of “genocide” as some have done (for example in this article: http://www.rationalreview.com/content/29773) for not having all the information we today have when she published her book Silent Spring 50 years ago! That strains logic.

    Deborah

  5. Daryl says:

    I hope that instead of hoping that “we would loose our appetite for destruction,” that Rachel Carson wanted us to lose it instead.

  6. Mel Visser says:

    Linda,

    I read your recent Rachel Carson story with interest. I wanted to post the following reply… Chemicals long banned in North America still have a dangerous presence and will as long as unfettered global use is allowed:

    Rachel’s Birthday

    Rachel Carson’s 100th birthday remembrance certainly brought out a diversity of viewpoints. Was she a visionary who eliminated toxic chemicals from America’s environment, or was she a crack pot whose radical actions are responsible for millions of malarial deaths?

    I hope that the 200th anniversary of her birthday will put her accomplishments into proper perspective. In a day in which any chemical that could be safely manufactured and used was approved, she pointed out environmental and human health problems of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) … chemicals designed to kill … occurring beyond their manufacture and use points. The process of democracy at its finest allowed the analysis, debate and banning of these chemicals over two decades. There is no other arena in history where man has reversed a technological course for environmental reasons. Yea human race!

    The use of PCB, DDT, toxaphene, chlordane, heptachlor, Lindane, Aldrin, Dieldrin, hexachlorocyclohexane and hexachlorobenzene were banned in the developed countries because they were suspected of causing cancer or were acutely toxic in the environment. Yea Rachel!

    As these bans were pursued in developing countries, argument focused upon malarial vector (mosquito) control. Why? The real battle should have been the use of DDT in general agriculture. When developing countries banned agricultural DDT, what did they use to control pests? Toxaphene? Banning DDT on grains and its discriminate use for mosquito control would avoid the spread of DDT in dangerous quantities and controlled mosquitoes. The DDT ban fight became a smokescreen for the use of all the other POPs.

    Now toxaphene, probably the most used pesticide on the planet, circulates through the air from its uses in developing countries and pollutes cold, clear waters from the northern Great Lakes to the Arctic. Lake Superior, a lake the size of the state of Maine with depths going to below sea level. Its waters, if spilled over the continental United States would cover the area to a depth of six feet and is frightfully polluted with foreign toxaphene. Its trout harbor 5 parts per million of toxaphene, ten times the level that would classify them as hazardous waste!

    Arctic polar bear and killer whales are on the edge of survival or decimated by banned pesticides and PCBs. PCBs and pesticides circulate through our air in hundreds of millions of molecules per breathful quantities, amounts that are now being connected to asthma, diabetes and cancer. Inuit ingest 15X a tolerable quantity of poisons.

    Rachel Carson was on the right track. Unfortunately, her work is not complete and the planet is still at risk. See the web site coldclearanddeadly.com for more details.

    Melvin J. Visser
    Kalamazoo, MI USA

Leave a Reply